Showing posts tagged business models.
x

second brain

elsewhere   

a digital common place book | an @s_m_i production

twitter.com/s_m_i:

    "We will always need editors to commission and shape strong stories, but we don’t need them so much to bundle disparate pieces of content into one immutable chunk. Instead, many of the most savvy readers prefer to consume magazine journalism piece by piece, taking note of the source from which it sprung, but not necessarily paying heed to whatever else happened to be placed alongside it in that source that particular week or month. Often what is more important is who wrote it, what it’s about, or when it happened to fall into view…I haven’t got a focus group to prove this, but I would bet that anyone who uses reading apps such as Longform, Instapaper, Readability, and Pocket prefers those content delivery mechanisms to bundled magazines. These platforms allow readers to select and sort content in a way that works for them, from disparate sources, without having to deal with cumbersome digital magazine files and swathes of packaged content that simply isn’t relevant, or of interest."
    — 9 months ago
    #META  #media  #publishing  #business models 
    "

    Social media has gone mainstream, and jaded geeks are totally over it. Facebook? It’s turned into “sludge for the brain now, filled with fluffy rabbits and gibberish.” Twitter? Just a mess of “mass-market spoonfed ‘trending topics.’” Instagram? What was once the epitome of geek chic has been overrun with filthy Android smartphone users, not to mention Iran’s Supreme Leader.

    So trendsetting geeks are pinning their hopes on a new, geekier-than-thou social network called App.net. For just $50, you, too can become part of this exclusive club of early adopters, free to sniff at the riffraff on Facebook and Twitter. Social networking has reached the crucial “alt” phase.

    "
    Guilty of putting my money where my mouth is: on August 6 I said, in response to this post by Seth Godin, that I “consider Twitter a utility (in both senses), and would pay up to $10 [per month]. Especially to get ads out of my stream.”

    App.net is less than half that. Yes, network effects etc. Yes, app.net might be to Twitter what Google+ is to everyone else. But I’m not hopeful that Twitter will get anywhere near Godin’s suggestion:

    My suggestion: Twitter has the opportunity to become extraordinarily aligned with their best users. Offer the top users the opportunity to pay $10 a month. For that fee, they can get an ever-growing list of features, including analytics, verification, 160 characters, who knows…
    That would be a service with paying for. Right now, I consider App.net an alternative worth backing.

    Equally guilty of naive optimism and insufficient cynicism. Let’s see how this goes.

    Tech Snobs Are Throwing Their Money At a New Indie Social Network

    — 9 months ago with 1 note
    #advertising  #twitter  #media  #social media  #business models  #Dalton Caldwell  #appnet 
    "

    My suggestion: Twitter has the opportunity to become extraordinarily aligned with their best users. Offer the top users the opportunity to pay $10 a month. For that fee, they can get an ever-growing list of features, including analytics, verification, 160 characters, who knows…

    10,000,000 users choosing to pay $10 a month means that the service turns a profit (!) of more than a billion dollars a year. And because the company is in alignment with their most powerful and evangelical users, that number grows over time. Every decision proposed will have to answer just one question: what makes our users happier?

    "

    Twitter, shut up and take my money. 

    Seth’s Blog: The difficult challenge of media alignment

    — 9 months ago with 1 note
    #advertising  #twitter  #Seth Godin  #business models 
    "Human are inherently social. It is the core of our species. It is not a feature. It is not an add-on. It is not a business model. Please stop molesting this word."

    Stipsters is definitely fetch, though.

    9 Signs you’ve become a Startup Hipster

    — 10 months ago
    #Startups  #tech  #hipsters  #stipsters  #social  #social media  #business models 
    "Saying that you’re going to make something “interactive” or launch some “video” is not the same thing as thinking about the medium. The medium is: app or web. Mobile or desktop. Kindle e-single or iOS in-app purchase. Facebook integration or push notification. These are the media channels that have yet to be thoroughly understood and colonized. If your thinking about the medium begins and ends with what you can stick on a web page, you’ve lost already."

    Christopher Mims, Technology Review. What’s Wrong With Almost Every Old Media-Inspired New Media Startup.

    Mims lists companies he believes get it (eg., Newser, News.me and the Atavist), writing, “Notice that what all of these examples have in common is that where they’re really succeeding isn’t the web. If you think you have the money and clout to be the next Huffington Post, be my guest, go “innovate.” But the web is a surprisingly mature medium, and old-media pundits turned new media hucksters who think they’re going to tell anyone else how to launch a sustainable business there are emperors sans clothes. New media companies that will succeed are founded by two kinds of people: technologists, and media people who think like technologists.”

    (via futurejournalismproject)

    What FJP said. Seriously.

    — 11 months ago with 32 notes
    #Christopher Mims  #innovation  #business models  #media  #platforms  #publishing 

    futurejournalismproject:

    Want some Gumbo with that Magazine?

    Publishers constantly consider their business models. Often it’s the now mundane debate about whether to paywall or not to paywall. Other times it’s about brand diversification.

    For example, the Washington Post survives because the Washington Post Company makes millions off of Kaplan, its for-profit education company. The New York Times Company, until recently, was part owner of the Boston Red Sox. Hearst, which publishes magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Esquire and Popular Mechanics, owns a number of television, radio and cable stations.

    In turbulent times, diversification can be a good thing. So take the Oxford American, the 23-year-old quarterly dedicated to southern writing. They’re opening a restaurant.

    Via the Oxford American:

    The Oxford American, a literary magazine of Southern culture, will soon transform its new buildings in Little Rock’s burgeoning South Main Street (SOMA) district into a home for diverse arts programming, thanks to a significant grant from ArtPlace.

    The space will include a restaurant that will celebrate Southern culinary culture. Accompanying the food will be nightly cultural programming that will feature the best of Southern arts and culture across a variety of formats including literature, music, film, art and drama. The Oxford American will focus on community-oriented programming developed through partnerships with local organizations and institutions.

    The Oxford American will also outfit this space with recording (audio and video) equipment that will allow all of the programming to be live-streamed over the organization’s website as well as recorded for podcasts, videos, and other presentations. New and unique broadcasts also will be developed through The OA’s existing partnerships with NPR and PBS. As a result, the programming will be viewed and appreciated by people all over the world.

    ArtPlace is a new national collaboration of eleven major national and regional foundations, six of the nation’s largest banks, and eight federal agencies, including the National Endowment for the Arts, to accelerate creative placemaking across the U.S. To date, ArtPlace has raised almost $50 million to work alongside federal and local governments to transform communities with strategic investments in the arts.

    Good reads. Good eats. Good entertainment.

    Liking this.

    — 11 months ago with 15 notes
    #magazines  #publishing  #business models  #oxford american  #restaurants  #media 
    "if you’re popular on Instagram, you can now get paid for slipping in a brand every so often. It’s like when Kim Kardashian tweets about 1-800-Flowers, but, you know, nicer to look at. And the plan is to make it a little bit classier."

    Instagram Isn’t Monetizing Those Retro Photos; This New Ad Network Is | PandoDaily

    He who waits to monetize will get beaten to the wallet. Or something.

    — 1 year ago
    #business models  #instagram  #instagrid network  #advertising 
    "I want to make it clear that I’m not against paying for content. But what I’ve just described aren’t paywalls, where publications warn users that they won’t be able to consume content for free. The situations I’m describing are blanket denials of content because of a choice I made about which device to use. With these tactics, media companies aren’t creating content paywalls, they’re creating content ghettos."
    — 1 year ago
    #audience  #consumption  #media  #publishing  #distribution  #business models  #paid content  #reuters  #paul smalera  #mobile  #digital 
    "Publishers should ask themselves why people need a third party service to get a “reading friendly” experience. And they should think about how they might partner with offline consumption services like Instapaper in a model where everybody, especially the reader, wins."
    — 1 year ago with 3 notes
    #media  #publishing  #advertising  #business models  #audience  #engagement  #instapaper 
    "Venture capitalists would rather fund a single billion-dollar company than a thousand mom-and-pop million-dollar shops. I can’t say that I fault them for this, but it cuts to the core of where their priorities lie: they gamble on high stakes, massive returns, while shunning the concerns of any business that wants to maintain a mom-and-pop Main Street business ideology. Personally, I prefer the Main Street shopping aesthetic to Walmart, and I know which part of town I want my business in."
    — 1 year ago
    #VC  #venture capital  #startups  #funding  #business models